Monday, April 13, 2015

 Quote 1
They saw male role models as more academically competent than did the other boys; therefore, they can see themselves as more capable of academic endeavors (Mancus 18).

Three paraphrase
Kids who had male teachers saw that males could be academic which allowed themselves to be more academic.
Male role models in academic professions allow young boys to view themselves as more capable of success in education.
Having males as teachers allow boys to view education as a more masculine trait and therefore allow themselves to see themselves as more academically competent.

 Quote 2
The tensions and contradictory messages coming from all quarters, female teacher colleagues, parents, administrators, system authorities, and the wider society are experienced as limitations on their natural inclinations to be warm, compassionate, and caring human beings (Hansen 11).

Three Paraphrase
Views of society conflict with male teacher’s natural instinct to be compassionate people.
Society pushes men away from being caring.
Society pushes teachers who are teachers from being caring.
Views of society push a male away from being caring teachers due to the fear of being judges and labeled as a psychopath.

In elementary school the majority of teachers are female. This, combined with an increasing number of families raised by single mothers, has caused an increase number of boys with very low self-esteem(Mancuss 5). Having males as teachers allow boys to view education as a more masculine trait and therefore allow themselves to see themselves as more academically competent (Mancus 18). Sadly, there is a push against having male teachers. Views of society push a male away from being caring teachers due to the fear of being judges and labeled as a psychopath (Hanse 11). This has caused a vicious cycle that continues to feeds itself.


Friday, April 10, 2015

Source: Mancus, Dianne Sirna. "Influence Of Male Teachers On Elementary School Children's Stereotyping Of Teacher Competence."

This source mainly connects with "Influence “CARING AND ELEMENTARY TEACHING”. That study focuses on the importantance of male educators and the view of them as caretakers and educators. Both of them talk about the importance of caring in elementary education. These two studies compliment each other, they are two sides of the same coin. They both look at caring and the male role of education; Mancus study focus on the teachers view while Hansen’s study focuses on the kids view.

"Why Men Become Elementary School Teachers: Insights From An Elementary Teacher Education Program." plays well with the study, it contrast the role of caring with the view of caring in education from men who are entering the field. It highlights that a lot of the time men are pretty oblivious to how important they are in the elementary education system. It highlights them as the “other”.

The study “Elementary Teachers: Male or Female." does not directly support any claims directly. Rather it looks at the positive academic and social benefits of male elementary educators. This one shows that male teachers do teach a bit differently from female teachers and this benefit kids academically by showing a different view.

Etaugh's study is the only source that refutes claim from this study. This study downplays the effects of men in education and says that there is real no positive benefits, academically or otherwise.

This source help understand all the sources but Etaughs better. This study helps color in the other side of most of the other sources. If one focuses on academic this focuses son caring. If one focuses on the teacher this one focuses on the other side of the desk. It highlight synergy between emotional, social and academics in education.

At a party I would be most nervous about this source meeting Etaugh's study. It is like when your conservative-ancap friend meets a socialist friend. The conservation needs to be very guided and find some middle ground. I think settling that there is a bit of truth in both of them will work best.
The other would be easy to introduce. It is like when I introduce one metal-head friend to another metal-head friend. It is an instant click. Each one is a bit different and have similar views but at the same time the fit is simple and natural. They agree on a lot of important topics and they help fill in the blanks of knowledge and information for each other. The conversation would not need to be guided, it would just be a natural fit.


Sunday, March 22, 2015

MLA CITES

First article
Sumsion, Jennifer. "Negotiating Otherness: A Male Early Childhood Educator's Gender Positioning." International Journal Of Early Years Education 8.2 (2000): 129-140. Professional Development Collection. Web. 22 Mar. 2015.

Second article
Friedewald, Mark. “Discussion Forums for Expectant Fathers: The Perspectives of Male Educators.” The Journal of Perinatal Education 17.3 (2008): 10–16. PMC. Web. 22 Mar. 2015.


Third article 
Zanetti, Federica. "Male educators in parental representations, among stereotypes and change: care professionals, nature or nurture?." Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education [Online], 9.3 (2014): 77-100. Web. 22 Mar. 2015

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Male Educators articles

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517183/?tool=pmcentrez

http://search.proquest.com/docview/280926917?pq-origsite=summon

http://search.proquest.com/docview/381064492?pq-origsite=summon

-----------------------edit: Round 2-----------------------------------
http://rpd.unibo.it/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517183/?tool=pmcentrez

http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=aee89b81-0495-45da-87e7-97f9821f9c87%40sessionmgr112&vid=1&hid=105




Friday, February 13, 2015

Rhet Anyalsis

The computer science hallway is part the newest part of the new science wing. Walking in from the already bright wing, the hallway is a lot lighter then its surrounding areas. Compared to the old dungeon it seems as though getting light into the area was a major concern in the designing. The area had many tables and chairs, some even obviously dragged from other areas. Even at off hours most of the tables were filled. The air smelled of the aroma of food that drifted in from Charlie's place. There was chattered littered with the sound of dice rolling. That added to the glow of computers screen made it as if this was some sort of nerd-cave. The addressing of the light could be a reference to the fact that nerds do not get enough sun.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Snow Day Assignment

    I am usually a pretty determined person. According to my mom. I am straight up stubborn. I don't really ever give up on something I have started unless I have succeeded. However, recently I have had a “Magical Black Man” moment. In this moment I was thinking about giving up on something but it was deeper then that. It was phase six out of seven for an interview for a job I would start after graduation. The process had been going on for a while at that point. It was late December and I had started it in late September. The last phase before getting the final on-site interview was a take home programing problem. I started working on it. I wrote a program that could solve the problem. It was slow. It took three hours to compute. I wasn't sure what do. I needed to get it to run in a reasonable amount of time. I was thinking having it just be precomputed and have the program just output he answer rather than computing. It wasn't stated in the problem that doing so was disallowed. I was stinking it could be a trick problem. The truth was that was a lie I told my self, it was a cop out. I was scared of achieving. Its ironic, I worked so hard in college so I would be able to get a great job after gradation. I had the opportunity for the perfect after college job and I wanted to fail on purpose. Succeeding meant having to face change I talked to my adviser, the chair of the Computer Science department, Dr.Klump. I didn't mention by fears of change. Just my idea that it could be trick question. He responded that obviously it was not. The company writes very fast software. The point of the programing test was to see if I could write optimized code. Dr.Klump very much inspired me to keep going. I did not have to take the job. I owed it to myself to show them how good I was. I did. I spent a few hours into the dawn optimizing it. I knew I am a good programer. I had to show it. I was going to  show it. It worked. I got the on site interview. I found out my program was the fastest in applicant ever turned in. It went from running for three hours to solving the problem in four milliseconds. I got the job. I am starting in June. I could not have done it with out Dr.Klump. I had the ability to do it all along but Dr.Klump lit my flame. In the Computer Science department Dr.Klump is scene as a sort of mystic. No matter a students problem he some how seems to have the solution they need.